Nations should pass laws to
preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these
areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and
explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting
your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing
the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The natural flow of the environment
will be interrupted in case people will start deforestation. Many of the
species will be in danger. Additionally these things will also contribute to
the natural disasters including floods.
Keeping in view these aspects it
is essential to pass laws which would monitor all these factors. Many times
deforestation is essential due to the frequently rising needs of the people as
well the rising population and scare resources. However if there would be no
laws to monitor this deforestation people will unending destroy the natural
resources. However to have some deforestation keeping in view the comparative
advantage makes sense.
We can example of an area where
the construction of the hospital is required, since a hospital at a large scale
could not be built in the residential area therefore it is essential to build
in the nearby the area after cutting off the forests. Similarly many of the industries could also be build for the economic benefit. In such cases laws are essential so that such action can
be taken keeping both the costs as well benefits.
Therefore it is essential to
formulate laws so as to keep flexibility to preserve the natural resources. On the
other hand reduction of natural areas including various species would destroy
their habitants and the whole ecosystem will be disturbed.
Keeping in view the above points
governments and the regulatory authorities should establish and pass laws so
that it could help to preserve further wilderness of the natural state of the environment.