Wednesday, 23 April 2014

Issue Essay-2 Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state




Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

The author above states that nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness area in their nature, I widely agree with the author based on following arguments.

First of all natural state of environment is feasible for all kind of lives. Due to the natural tendency, people have access to neat and clean environment. The deforestation may cause danger to the lives of various species. Since last decade various species have been extinct, and there is immense need to preserve it.

Due to the natural beauty, various tourists attract towards country. We can take example of Asia, where tourists love to visit, due to its natural beauty. A huge inflow of tourists would help economies to earn enough foreign reserves, which help economies to build up. Contrarily if there is deforestation, tourists will not visit such places and thus there would be an opportunity cost.

Secondly, forestation helps to avoid floods and land erosion. The strong roots of the huge forests keep soil together through a robust bond, which combat land erosion. Alternatively, if there is deforestation, it would easily take away soil with meager rain falls, and it would cause floods.

Thirdly it is pertinent that albeit we need to have constructions in order to cope with the rising population, however the opportunity cost of the deforestation is far more. While considering the both sides of argument it is therefore very important for the nations to have laws to combat more destruction of nature and to preserve remaining wilderness.


No comments:

Post a Comment